In an explosive development, Eric has issued a decisive ultimatum that could end his collaboration with Katie Bold’s new fashion label, Logan. He demands two non-negotiable conditions: full financial transparency and an empowered advisory role for Brooke Forester, or he will sever ties, 𝓉𝒽𝓇𝑒𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒾𝓃𝑔 a rift in the Forester family legacy and the future of Logan’s launch.

Tensions have escalated sharply within the Forester family, placing the beloved legacy brand at a crossroads. Eric, once a key consultant for Katie’s fresh, unapologetic label Logan, has now drawn a line in the sand over the brand’s stewardship and creative integrity.

The saga unfolded amidst fierce internal conflict. Ridge Forester’s vehement objection to Katie’s solo control ignited a powder keg of emotions. Brooke Forester’s hurt and Eric’s unexpected alliance with Katie sparked headlines and whispers that threatened to unravel decades of family loyalty and business unity.

With public and private pressure mounting, Eric convened a high-stakes family meeting in the Forester boardroom. His calm yet commanding presence cut through the chaos. He laid bare the painful truths behind the discord and delivered his conditions with razor-sharp clarity to preserve the house’s soul.

Eric’s first demand is radical financial accountability. He insists on binding agreements that require full governance and transparency for any deals linking Logan with Forester’s historic brand assets. An independent committee of trustees must have veto power over any arrangement that risks degrading the Forester legacy.

The second condition strikes at the heart of family respect. Brooke Forester is to be granted a genuine advisory seat on Logan’s board for projects intersecting with the Forester name. This role will go far beyond tokenism, granting her authoritative voice and voting rights in all joint decisions.

This dual-demand plan is designed not just to protect the Forester name but to stop it from becoming a mere marketing prop. Eric’s unwavering stance challenges Katie and the Forester board to act responsibly, foreclosing any attempt to exploit the family heritage for headline grabs or quick profits.

The tension of these demands reverberated instantly. Ridge Forester openly questioned Eric’s divided loyalties and accused him of wielding veto power as leverage. Yet Eric remained unyielding, emphasizing his role as a guardian of legacy, not a pawn in a family feud engulfed by media spectacle.

Brooke Forester’s response was unexpectedly poignant. She accepted the mantle of stewardship with grace but made it clear she would not serve as a mere shield or silent figurehead. Her commitment signaled a rare reconciliation, hinting at a fragile truce emerging beneath the family’s fractious surface.

Eric then took the bold step of confronting Katie in her own studio. What followed was a tense negotiation blending mutual respect with stubborn resolve. Katie, recognizing the gravity of the situation, agreed—reluctantly but sincerely—to the terms that promised transparency and involvement rather than secretive control.

With legal eyes watching, they formalized the agreement, establishing independent trustees and quarterly public audits. Brooke secured her seat, and a binding clause guaranteed that Forester’s heritage would not be licensed or altered without rigorous review. This contract symbolizes a fragile but hopeful new chapter for both brands.

The public edition of the deal was met with mixed reactions. Media outlets buzzed with praise and suspicion alike. Forester Creations’ board treated it as a ceasefire, while Ridge eyed the arrangement warily, sensing the line beneath the surface still taut and threatened by future strain.

True testing came swiftly. A major conglomerate proposed a lucrative mass-market line under “Logan by Forester,” 𝓉𝒽𝓇𝑒𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒾𝓃𝑔 to cheapen Forester’s high-artisan image. Katie faced a tough choice: accept the tempting numbers or protect the intricate craft her new label stood for under Eric’s vigilant watch.

Never one to back down, Katie called for renegotiations with the conglomerate, prioritizing quality over cash. When the conglomerate balked, she decisively killed the deal. The move sparked headlines as a missed opportunity, yet industry insiders lauded the brand’s steadfast refusal to sacrifice integrity for short-term gain.

Eric stood proudly as the brand’s protector, knowing that the conditions he imposed held firm. Katie’s respect for the committee’s oversight and Brooke’s advisory input prevented a catastrophic sellout, a rare victory for craft over commerce in the ruthless world of fashion heritage.

Weeks later, an uneasy but visible peace settled. Brooke, now officially Logan’s special adviser on craft and heritage, commanded respect at combined Forester-Newman press events. Ridge’s subtle approval and Eric’s measured relief signaled cautious optimism—but no one forgot that fragile peace rests on firm commitments.

Behind closed doors, Ridge questioned Eric about the ultimatum’s future. Eric’s response was clear and resolute: if Katie breaks the conditions, he will leave. His loyalty is conditional on respect for the house that shaped him, underscoring the seriousness of this high-stakes agreement and its precarious longevity.

In the volatile world of Genoa City fashion and family empires, Eric’s two conditions have become the critical fulcrum balancing innovation and tradition. This agreement preserves the Forester legacy while allowing Katie’s new brand to flourish—if the fragile alliance holds under future pressures.

Tonight, Eric reflects on collars, cuffs, and craftsmanship—the fine stitches that save lives and legacies alike. His ultimatum has drawn a bright line, demanding responsibility and respect from all involved. As the Logan launch moves forward, the family and fashion world watch anxiously: will the peace endure or shatter?